I needed some language data, so I ended up making something similar to this site: https://probablyhelpful.com/languages/Japanese.html. Except with newer data, more visualizations, searchable tables, and some helpful statistics.
Why
There are a number of factors unique to Japanese that create upward wage pressure for bilingual speakers.
From the demand side:
Japan is and has been the country with the most direct investment in the US. 1, 2
Japan is the fourth largest economy (investment target) 3, fifth when adjusting for PPP 4
On the supply side:
Japan ranks poorly in the “English Proficiency Index”. 5
Japanese is among the hardest language to learn for English speakers (along with Arabic, Chinese, Korean). 6
Japan has a small emigrant population relative to its population size. 7
Regional concentrations/disparities within the US (the purpose of this analysis). 8
Together, these factors make Japanese a uniquely valuable language in the US. China/Chinese is similar in some respects, but lacks, basically any, direct investments into the US. For reference, in 2025 Austria had more direct investment into the US than China.
As an aside, I wish the BLS would release language specific data on Interpreters and Translators. Rather than the general translator bucket. (How am I supposed to interpret the wage data!)
There is also the complication of specializations that require language ability as an addition, but are not a “translator” role. With the right data I imagine they could create an average % wage premium that a language adds.
An example, wherein the wage premium of a foreign language skill (FLS) was identified (in Poland).
U.S. Census Bureau. “Language Spoken at Home by Ability to Speak English for the Population 5 Years and Over.” American Community Survey, ACS 5-Year Estimates Detailed Tables, Table B16001.
The errors are based on a 90% confidence interval.
ACS data is not a census and may suffer from non-sampling error.
Data is for all age groups when one might only be interested in those of working age (18-64) my best estimate puts it at ~60%.
This 60% figure can also invite scrutiny. Explained further below.
The bilingual statistic is based on those who responded as speaking english “very well”, excluding those who selected as speaking “well” or below.
Individuals who know the language may interpret “speak language at home” more strictly and not respond with the language spoken. ie. A language learner w/o someone to speak w/ at home.
Speaking at home is used as a proxy to fluency, but such fluency may be considered insufficient by other standards. (尊敬語 or reading/writing skills come to mind)
Observations
Hawaii has the highest proportion of Japanese, but due to size Hawaii actually has fewer bilingual speakers than the NYC metro area (20552 Bilingual speakers in Hawaii; 23268 Bilingual speakers in NY-NJ metro area).
Alaska, Utah, Nevada stood out as locations not traditionally associated with a Japanese diaspora, but had relatively high populations of Japanese speakers.
Florida and Texas have a low proportion of Japanese speakers, but make up for it by sheer size.
atlanta-sandy springs-roswell, ga metro division; atlanta-sandy springs-roswell, ga metro area
4591766
311
3642234
10169
6239
1064
3574
761
0.135874
0.077835
57.284821
marietta, ga metro division; atlanta-sandy springs-roswell, ga metro area
1301511
115
1076929
5376
1237
306
859
248
0.095043
0.066000
69.442199
boston, ma metro division; boston-cambridge-newton, ma-nh metro area
1947655
150
1421953
6523
3073
660
2165
531
0.157779
0.111159
70.452327
cambridge-newton-framingham, ma metro division; boston-cambridge-newton, ma-nh metro area
2325264
78
1652376
7223
4417
480
3116
405
0.189957
0.134006
70.545619
rockingham county-strafford county, nh metro division; boston-cambridge-newton, ma-nh metro area
431393
101
404899
1812
140
80
135
81
0.032453
0.031294
96.428571
chicago-naperville-schaumburg, il metro division; chicago-naperville-elgin, il-in metro area
6789711
111
4576500
12296
9881
1000
5936
774
0.145529
0.087426
60.074891
elgin, il metro division; chicago-naperville-elgin, il-in metro area
712200
39
517436
3885
375
194
256
158
0.052654
0.035945
68.266667
lake county, il metro division; chicago-naperville-elgin, il-in metro area
676256
4
463738
3120
1269
292
901
243
0.187651
0.133234
71.000788
lake county-porter county-jasper county, in metro division; chicago-naperville-elgin, il-in metro area
682320
96
596637
2864
268
158
191
132
0.039278
0.027993
71.268657
dallas-plano-irving, tx metro division; dallas-fort worth-arlington, tx metro area
5038495
155
3303773
12593
7177
1326
4410
1043
0.142443
0.087526
61.446287
(27 more rows not shown)
Other Stats
The data does not provide information on age (we might be interested in working age pop).
Below is my best estimate at a working age population correction factor.
203,771,037 / 316,142,548 = 64.5%
of the general populace is working age (18 to 64)
330,000 * 67% ~= 220,000
Working age JPN immigrants
1,060,000 * 58% ~= 615,000
Working age native born JPN-Americans
(220,000 + 615,000) / 1,390,000 ~= 60%
Estimate for working age population among JPN in the US.
One issue with this estimate is the use of race/ethnicity instead of language ability. However the alternative, language ability/age dataset, is grouped up into the larger group of API (Asia/Pacific Islander). This is problematic due to the sheer size and diversity of individuals coming from Asia (Japanese immigrants are but a small fraction of that).